Learning & Skills

Metacognition: The Habit of Thinking About How You Think

Share
Person at desk reflecting on their own thinking process with notebook and mind map sketches

Key Takeaways

Metacognition is the practice of monitoring and adjusting how you learn, not just what you learn.
Learners who use metacognitive strategies tend to retain information more effectively.
It involves two parts: knowing your own learning tendencies, and actively regulating your strategies.
Simple habits like self-questioning and post-session reflection can build metacognitive skill.
Metacognition pairs naturally with a growth mindset and self-directed learning approaches.

Metacognition

Metacognition means thinking about your own thinking. It is the habit of stepping back from a task to notice how you are learning, what is working, what is confusing you, and what you might do differently. It is sometimes described as the brain's ability to observe and regulate itself during learning.

In educational psychology, metacognition is typically divided into two components: metacognitive knowledge (what you know about your own learning tendencies) and metacognitive regulation (the active monitoring and adjusting of strategies in real time).

What Metacognition Actually Means

Most of us learned how to study by trial and error — trying to memorize things, hoping they'd stick. What we were rarely taught was how to observe and adjust the process of learning itself. That's exactly what metacognition is.

Coined and developed in the context of cognitive psychology — particularly through the work of researcher John Flavell in the 1970s — metacognition is often summarized as "thinking about thinking." In practice, it means pausing during or after a learning task to ask: Did I actually understand that? What strategy am I using? Is it working?

It is a core concept in the broader landscape of learning strategy. You can explore its place alongside related ideas in the Learning Strategy Glossary, which defines spaced repetition, retrieval practice, and other foundational terms for self-directed learners.

High Impact

Metacognition rated by education researchers

The Education Endowment Foundation's Teaching and Learning Toolkit rates metacognition and self-regulation among the highest-impact approaches for improving student learning outcomes.

7+ months

Estimated learning gains from metacognitive strategies

According to the Education Endowment Foundation, students who are explicitly taught metacognitive strategies show learning progress equivalent to approximately seven additional months of schooling.

The Two Pillars: Knowledge and Regulation

Educational psychologists generally break metacognition into two interconnected parts:

  • Metacognitive knowledge — What you know about yourself as a learner. For example: "I tend to zone out when reading dense text" or "I learn better by explaining things aloud." This self-knowledge builds over time through reflection.
  • Metacognitive regulation — The active, in-the-moment management of your learning. This includes planning how to approach a task, monitoring your comprehension as you go, and evaluating whether your strategy worked afterward.

Together, these two pillars form a feedback loop. The more you know about your own tendencies, the better you can regulate. The more you regulate, the more you learn about what works for you.

This loop connects naturally to a growth mindset, which emphasizes that learning ability is not fixed but can be developed through effort and reflection.

“Metacognitive knowledge is knowledge about cognition in general, as well as awareness and knowledge about one's own cognition.”

— John Flavell, Developmental psychologist credited with foundational research on metacognition

Why Most Learners Skip This Step

Metacognition feels effortful — and that's partly why many people skip it. It's much easier to re-read a chapter or scroll through notes and feel like you've done something productive. But passive review creates what researchers call the illusion of fluency: information feels familiar, so your brain signals understanding even when deep learning hasn't occurred.

For a closer look at this common trap, see our article on why re-reading your notes often isn't as effective as it feels.

Metacognition interrupts that comfortable but inefficient loop. It asks you to honestly assess: Could I explain this without looking at my notes? Where exactly did my understanding break down? That discomfort is a signal that real learning is happening.

Try the 'Blank Page' Test After Studying

Close your notes and try to write everything you just learned on a blank page — in your own words, from memory. Whatever you can't write down points to a genuine gap rather than a fluency illusion. Do this at the end of each session and use what you find to plan your next one.

Practical Ways to Start Building the Habit

You don't need special tools or training to begin practicing metacognition. These straightforward habits can be layered into any study routine:

  1. Pre-session planning: Before you begin, write down what you intend to learn and which strategy you'll use. This primes your brain for intentional engagement. Our pre-session readiness checklist walks through exactly how to do this.
  2. Comprehension checks during study: Pause every 10–15 minutes and ask yourself, without looking, what you just learned. If you can't summarize it, that's useful data.
  3. Post-session reflection: Spend two minutes after studying writing answers to: What did I understand well? What confused me? What will I change next time?
  4. Strategy swapping: If your current approach isn't working after a fair trial, name an alternative. For instance, shifting from passive reading to active recall or concept mapping.

These habits fit naturally into a broader self-directed learning framework that helps you take ownership of your educational progress.

Learning & Skills Editorial Team is the collective byline for our editorial team and contributor network. Articles published under this byline or an editorial pen name are researched, written, and reviewed according to our editorial standards for clarity, consistency, and independence before publication.

View all articles by Learning & Skills Editorial Team →
Disclaimer: The content provided on our blog site traverses numerous categories, offering readers valuable and practical information. Readers can use the editorial team’s research and data to gain more insights into their topics of interest. However, they are requested not to treat the articles as conclusive. The website team cannot be held responsible for differences in data or inaccuracies found across other platforms. Please also note that the site might also miss out on various schemes and offers available that the readers may find more beneficial than the ones we cover.